The article ignores California’s push to ban oil and gas

This article totally ignores the elephant in the room of California’s increasingly severe policies that work toward the goal of banning oil & gas in the state.

It was amusing reading through the excuses of why California is paying 5 or 6 times the amount for natural gas than the rest of the U.S.

Of course, for years actively blocking new oil and gas pipelines from other states had nothing to do with it, right?

California is a self-mandated “Energy Island”.

Please do an internet search for
> California Energy Island
if you have no idea what I am talking about.

Go ahead California, work faster and harder toward your Green Energy Utopia of getting rid of hydrocarbons and making everything electric, 100% powered by wind & solar and any other “renewable” energy.

● Be the shining example to the rest of the world that you don’t need or want hydrocarbons.

==================

“Perhaps you’ve heard PG&E and its counterparts’ explanation:
● demand was up and wholesale gas prices spiked.

San Diego Gas spoke with our sister station, NBC 7 Responds.

“This increase is much larger than we ever could have anticipated,” said Candace Hadley, a utility spokesperson.

… Wholesale natural gas prices are regional and change daily. We looked at a stretch in January.

● California’s gas prices were four, five, and almost six times higher than much of the U.S. for days.

● In some other parts of the country, there was extra natural gas– so much that some producers were paying others to take it off their hands.

“In January and February for most of the United States the weather has been warmer than normal, said Chris Higginbotham with the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

● “And that has meant natural gas demand has gone down, it’s below average right now.”  …

nbcbayarea.com ↗

FROM THE THREAD

Tom's notes 6

  1. Tom Kirkman

    John S. I don't have an issue with homes and small businesses adding in a solar power panel array on their roof (or above business parking lots).

    What irks me is the demonization of hydrocarbons (and nuclear) while wind and solar are proclaimed as the saviors of the world. They aren't. Germany has proved this with their wind and solar push for over a decade.

    Wind and solar can *augment* hydrocarbons abd nuclear.
    Wind and solar cannot *replace* hydrocarbons and nuclear.

  2. Tom Kirkman

    Doug, I'll repeat... California has *chosen* to become an "Energy Island".

    California has long been actively blocking new oil and gas pipelines into California from other states.

    So California is *choosing* to have higher energy prices.

    I have zero sympathy for California's high energy prices. They actively chose higher energy prices (and higher energy taxes).

  3. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Nelson Humphreys

    I have no idea how to fix pricing for individual homes that have sime solar panels on their roof.

    When I was living in tropical Malaysia (close to the equator) most new homes built had a few solar panels on the roof just for the hot water heater.

  4. Tom Kirkman

    Thanks Scott Duncan, MPA

  5. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Jeff Thomson

    I expect a few more totally random "accidents" in totally random California oil & gas infrastructure.

Keep reading

Enjoyed that?
Get the next one.

New posts on energy, projects and Weekend Science — straight to your inbox, without the algorithm.