Alternate viewpoints on Japan’s $56 billion U.S. energy deal
Tom KirkmanIndependent Project Manager
Some alternate viewpoints about global energy changes and restructuring, for your consideration.
More detailed analysis in the link.
=============================
“Japan Signs Major $56 Billion Energy Deal with U.S, Strategically Boosting Energy Relationship
… watch the U.S.-Japan trade relationship closely because the outlines of multiple geopolitical shifts can be referenced from a new strategic relationship surrounding multiple sectors.
The U.S, relationship with Japan is both leverage and a hedge against old alliances that may seek to disrupt the global reset currently underway through President Trump policy.
The issues with the European Union, U.K, USMCA and other tenuous allies, look entirely different when President Trump has alternative partnerships for massive energy exports.
… It is not accidental that India is sending support vessels to the Strait of Hormuz as requested by President Trump.
Here’s the kicker… With oil and gas from Russia, India doesn’t need the Iranian oil and gas; yet, they are sending support. Why?
Because Prime Minister Modi wants Trump to keep their Russian purchase exemptions in place.
We can see how a strong collaborative relationship with Japan can negate any negative economic impact the mask wearing Europeans and Canadians might want to try and leverage.
In actuality, Canada, the U.K and Europe don’t have any leverage at all in the new world of trade.
●●●》One way to look at this is to say the primary “Build Back Better” nations, those most entrenched in the selling of climate change as a tool for manipulation and control, are being positioned to have the least amount of input into a new, tiered set of established nations for global energy development.
Take a look at that Russian Sanctions map again.
The nations in yellow created the sanctions:
…”