AI calls me a prominent voice on energy; mostly right

AI summary from an internet search for “Tom Kirkman energy”

Pretty happy that AI says I am
“a prominent voice on energy policy and the energy transition.”

Mostly the AI summary gets it right, except my views on hydrogen have changed over the years (after many discussions and much digging around, I no longer view hydrogen as a potentially viable energy solution).

FROM THE THREAD

Tom's notes 8

  1. Tom Kirkman

    For amusement, you can also try an internet search for
    my name + LinkedIn + (specific topic)
    and you should find some of my many posts from LinkedIn catalogued on the internet 😁

    tom kirkman linkedin time travelling duck

    tom kirkman linkedin electric cow

    tom kirkman linkedin liquefied natural electricity

    tom kirkman oil and gas

  2. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Gerry Deagnon

    equal and opposite reaction ...
    (Newton's Third Law of Emotion) 😁

  3. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Gerry Deagnon

    equal and opposite reaction ...
    (Newton's Third Law of Emotion) 😁

  4. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Dave Gardner

    careful with that dangerous chemical substance!

  5. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Chris Matchette-Downes

    pretty much agreed, but I am nit familiar with natural hydrogen deposits.
    Off the top of my head, I can't think of many natural substances which are non-permeable enough underground to store large deposits of hydrogen.
    Hydrogen molecules are so small, much smaller than the more complex methane molecules, so hydrogen tends to leak.

Keep reading

Enjoyed that?
Get the next one.

New posts on energy, projects and Weekend Science β€” straight to your inbox, without the algorithm.