Ban facts to protect settled climate science
We need to ban facts in order to protect Settled Climate Science from harmful questions.
We need to ban facts in order to protect Settled Climate Science from harmful questions.

FROM THE THREAD
no worries, just blindly believe whatever Settled Science you are told by Science Experts, and all of your confusion will melt away into the peaceful bliss of unthinking nirvana.
Chris Matchette-Downes
accurate.
2 Participation Awards for you good sir.
but I don't see any face melting ...
truth stretching is a remarkably effective way to get government funding.
"Climate Science" is an oxymoron, akin to "Benevolent Government".
go for it. When I write posts here, I generally just go with whatever reader flow pops up organically.
ian e wood
I encourage you to block me if what I write here is not to your liking. Seriously.
I've been writing here on LinkedIn for over a decade. People need to be able to laugh at silly stuff in order to relieve work-related stress.
A Climate Star Chamber?
(80s movie reference)
the link won't open for me.
sure why not. I've been a guest on quite a few podcasts.
Randall Forsyth
yes, I know. I'm openly laughing at the crazy Orwellian Right Think idiocy of "Settled Science".
"Climate Science" is has become an oxymoron. A clown show.
The Climate Crisis agenda has hijacked actual Science and turned anything related to naturl climate change into a massively expensive grift mandated by governments.
bird flu looks to be the next pre-planned disaster.
Enjoyed that?
Get the next one.
New posts on energy, projects and Weekend Science β straight to your inbox, without the algorithm.