Tom KirkmanIndependent Project Manager
Hey LinkedIn Censors, are you paying attention yet?
=================================
“Attorney General Andrew Bailey:
I am launching an investigation into Google – the biggest search engine in America – for censoring conservative speech during the most consequential election in our nation’s history.”
FROM THE THREAD
Please be aware, LinkedIn has dumped me in their shadowban doghouse right now.
Numerous people and longtime connections have advised that I am no longer in their daily feed at all.
Which can be odd, because I typically write at least 3 to 5 posts every day, and have for a long time.
LinkedIn is not liking me calling out their censorship of Conservative voices.
My viewer stats have dropped to next to nothing,
since I asked Linked In Help to investigate
why I am currently blocked from contributing to their Project Management collaborative articles.
Even though LinkedIn recently advised me through formal notification that
I am in the
**top 1% globally**
for contributing
**high quality contributions**
to their AI powered collaborative articles on Project Management.
If LinkedIn tells me *in writing* that I am in the top 1% of contributors to Project Management collaborative articles - which was determined by human reviewers and not by AI - then why is LinkedIn *actively blocking me* from further contributing to their Project Management collaborative articles?
My current viewer stats right now, dropped off to next to nothing.
Recent screencaps. I added a red outline to highlight LinkedIn's written notification to me.
Matt Allen
Matt Allen
correct.
correct.
clearly, you do not understand the concept of Freedom of Speech.
Censorship is not a solution.
Censorship is a *problem*.
clearly, you do not understand the concept of Freedom of Speech.
Censorship is not a solution.
Censorship is a *problem*.
you are providing a BS Strawman argument.
It seems pretty obvious that you are deliberately distracting and deflecting from the fact that you clearly stated in your previous comment that you want Google to ban people who disagree with your viewpoints.
I cannot agree with your views to have Google censor people that you personally disagree with.
》You are part of the problem.
End of discussion, I will not entertain wasting any further time listening to your pro-censorship views.
you are providing a BS Strawman argument.
It seems pretty obvious that you are deliberately distracting and deflecting from the fact that you clearly stated in your previous comment that you want Google to ban people who disagree with your viewpoints.
I cannot agree with your views to have Google censor people that you personally disagree with.
》You are part of the problem.
End of discussion, I will not entertain wasting any further time listening to your pro-censorship views.
yep, clearly some feathers are getting unsmoothed.
my "sin" here is venturing into disputing the Climate Panic narrative, which irks the Climate Panic brigade. I have over 2 decades in the energy business, so this is very much on a business topic.
I try to avoid open Democrat / Republican disputes because I tend to view all governments as corrupt and incompetent regardless of their political affiliation.
But my biggest sin here is openly expressing mostly conservative and libertarian views.
My LinkedIn headline should provide a clue.
my "sin" here is venturing into disputing the Climate Panic narrative, which irks the Climate Panic brigade. I have over 2 decades in the energy business, so this is very much on a business topic.
I try to avoid open Democrat / Republican disputes because I tend to view all governments as corrupt and incompetent regardless of their political affiliation.
But my biggest sin here is openly expressing mostly conservative and libertarian views.
My LinkedIn headline should provide a clue.
it's not at all "accidental". It is *deliberate*.
Enjoyed that?
Get the next one.
New posts on energy, projects and Weekend Science — straight to your inbox, without the algorithm.