Limiting EV range is justified to save the climate, apparently

But it’s to Save the Climate from Extinction, so limiting EV mobility range is totally justified.

=======================

“It is not enough for people to just switch from gas-powered cars to electric vehicles (EVs) in order to fight global warming.

The climate brigade also wants to forcibly limit the range of people’s EVs to ensure they do not drive “too much” and kill the planet.

A consortium of professors from California and members of the so-called “climate community” are pushing to make EV batteries *less* powerful in order to stop climate change.

They also want to make passenger cars smaller, which they claim will “makes the roads far safer because smaller cars have fewer and less severe crashes.”

“Making bus routes, metros, and electric bikes faster, safer, and more convenient will disproportionately support low-income and non-white community members – who are more likely to live near high traffic areas and bear the environmental health burdens of relatively poorer air quality compared to higher-income and white counterparts,” the group further said.

The goal of this Climate Community Project, as its members are calling it, is to achieve a 71 percent reduction in personal vehicle ownership in the coming years.

By trapping people at home, there will be less demand for energy, which will stop the polar ice caps from melting, we are told. …”

naturalnews.com ↗

FROM THE THREAD

Tom's notes 6

  1. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Jonathan Jennings

    thanks, but the updates are all in my head. I normally read a lot every day, and have for the last few decades.

    I do try to share my viewpoints, which can shift around a bit when I read new information.

    I've written over 25,000 posts and comments in the last decade, mostly about oil & gas & energy, and also poking fun at the climate panic narrative.

  2. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Paul Roth

    spot on.

  3. Tom Kirkman

    My absurdist sarcastic posts here on LinkedIn actually have a purpose.

    Tyrants generally can't stand being openly mocked and ridiculed, they don't know how to respond.

    That is probably why I rarely get pushback here from the progressive tryrants.

    ========================

    Why is laughter the bane of tyrants?

    Because tyrants seek to enslave people, but laughter helps an individual break free from such enslavement." ...

    https://intellectualtakeout.org/2022/06/laughter-the-bane-of-tyrants/

  4. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Boris Zhmud

    yep, pretty much.

  5. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Jay Harbath

    indeed. That is the current reality for modern "science". Paycheck Science. Whoever has the gold decides the science rules these days.

Keep reading

Enjoyed that?
Get the next one.

New posts on energy, projects and Weekend Science — straight to your inbox, without the algorithm.