There is no energy transition, only energy addition

There is no Energy *Transition* —> There is only Energy *Addition*

This morning I finally made a meme of a phrase I have often repeated for years here on LinkedIn.

⚫ Wind and solar can only *augment*  hydrocarbons and nuclear.

⚫ Wind and solar *cannot replace* hydrocarbons and nuclear.

> In my view, *COP 29* is the *Ne Plus Ultra* of *Energy Disinformation*.

FROM THE THREAD

Tom's notes 5

  1. Tom Kirkman

    One of my posts here on LinkedIn from 2 years ago:

    https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tomkirkman_natural-gas-a-wellspring-for-the-us-and-activity-6997257191808278528-HhAB

    ========================

    ● Wind, solar and hydro can *augment* hydrocarbons.

    ● But currently they cannot *replace* hydrocarbons.

    ● And they will be unable to replace hydrocarbons any time soon, for many decades.

    Here is a bigger picture for you to think about:

    》"From the beginning of the industrial revolution to today, not a single energy source has decreased in annual absolute global consumption.

    》This includes coal, oil, natural gas, nuclear, and any other form of energy you can think of.

    ...

  2. Tom Kirkman

    ⚡️Adam B. my intended audience here is *not* the mostly-unable-to-think-for-themselves brigade.
    Usually I just ignore them.
    Those who *refuse* to think for themselves are *unable* to be swayed by logic and reason.
    So usually I don't waste my time engaging with those who *refuse* to think critically.

  3. Tom Kirkman

    Soren Stirling who was I expecting for what, this time around?
    I'm not following the meaning of your question ...

  4. Tom Kirkman

    Thanks Mahmut

  5. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Steve Lee

    our politicians *refuse* to see it.

Keep reading

Enjoyed that?
Get the next one.

New posts on energy, projects and Weekend Science — straight to your inbox, without the algorithm.