Biden’s green policies are malicious, not merely stupid
Tom KirkmanIndependent Project Manager
The Biden administration’s green climate change policies are not “stupid” or “misinformed”, rhey are knowingly and maliciously evil, with the intent of destroying the U.S.
======================
“… Let us begin with escalating climate mandates, now reaching gas stoves and tires, seeking the total elimination of fossil fuels.
Because our mainstream media, more out of reflexive conformity than malevolence, constantly amplify climate alarmism, most Americans believe climate programs are designed in good faith to protect us from planetary disasters.
Climate subsidies are aimed, they are led to believe, at increasing prosperity through good “green” jobs in emerging “green” industries, all part of the supposedly improved “Bidenomics” economy, however counterintuitive many think them to be.
When Biden, immediately upon assuming office, stopped issuing new drilling leases, canceled the Keystone Pipeline, and issued EPA regulations effectively shutting down multiple power plants in the near future, was he, however idealistically, trying to wean our country off of fossil fuels in favor of clean, “renewable” energy?
If so, what could be wrong with that?
If the administration had calculated that lost energy from stifling fossil fuel sources could actually be replaced, these initiatives, even if overly optimistic, could be viewed as well-intended.
However, within the climate camp, it has been well known that fossil fuels, which power 82% of world energy needs, cannot conceivably be replaced by renewable energy to any substantial degree.
So, as these policies take effect over the coming years, our hospitals and medical centers, relying on petroleum-based plastic furniture, fixtures, and equipment, energy-dependent stainless-steel implements, and high-power physical plants, will be hit hard.
Health care costs will soar, while treatment will decrease to emerging society levels.
Our food costs, already rising dramatically, will skyrocket as petroleum fertilizer, now tripling yields, becomes economically impractical.
Housing costs, dependent on fuel-powered equipment and concrete and steel needing massive energy inputs to manufacture, will put homeownership out of reach for all but the rich and reduce housing to cramped, third-world levels.
And, of course, transportation will become an expensive luxury for both people and products.
But isn’t this all meant well?
– For trusting, uncritical moderates and traditional liberals, yes.
– For the progressives pulling the strings, no.
●》Maurice Strong, the Canadian socialist responsible for steering the United Nations into the bureaucratic sinecures of the climate alarmist IPCC, has stated from the outset that
●》his intention is the diminishment of the wealth of the Western industrialized nations, making them more like less-advantaged societies. …”