Pollution is a real problem; climate change is not

Pollution is a *real problem*, globally.

Climate is *not*.

Pollution is plainly evident globally, on land and on sea.

● Pollution is not natural.

● Pollution is man made.

● Climate Change is *natural*.

● Natural Climate Change is *primarily* due to solar activity, and *not* mankind.

Isn’t it amazing that this ^ simple logic causes conniptions in those who are *paid* to promote the Climate Alarm narrative?

Those who make their livelihood off of promoting Climate Alarmism do not want you to actually *think* or – heaven forbid – to ask legitimate questions?

Science is all about ASKING QUESTIONS and testing and revising theories.

Science is NOT about shouting down and CENSORING legitimate questions.

Science is NOT about telling people to blindly believe those who label themselves as
Self-Appointed Science Priests Of Total Knowledge Who Cannot Be Questioned.

< Think about it >

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Pollution is a *real problem*, globally.

Climate Change is *not*.

● ● ● 》 CLEANING UP pollution is part of the solution.

● ● ● 》 ADAPTING to natural climate change is part of the solution.

FROM THE THREAD

Tom's notes 17

  1. Tom Kirkman

    Thanks Christian Leuchtenberg. This seems painfully obvious to me.

    But clearly, many will want to disagree.
    Because of their blind faith and blind belief in self-labelled *experts* in climate.

  2. Tom Kirkmanreplying to Diane M. Kimura

    but but but ... we useless eater peons need to just sit down and shut up and *comply* with the dictates handed down by our Globalist Dear Leader Gods.

  3. Tom Kirkman

    Judarius S. Indeed. Trying to spur some independent critical thinking in those who studiously *refuse* to actually think independently for themselves can often be futile.

    But sometimes there is a glimmer, a spark of hope, that non-thinkers might actually consider looking at things objectively, rather than being content with being ordered what to think by those with nefarious vested interests.

  4. Tom Kirkman

    Henry P. agreed.

  5. Tom Kirkman

    Thanks Barry Folk

Keep reading

Enjoyed that?
Get the next one.

New posts on energy, projects and Weekend Science — straight to your inbox, without the algorithm.